Japan’s Moriyasu plan to use Shiogai sparks debate

Japan’s national team, after a 32‑team exit at the 2026 North‑Central America World Cup, saw coach Moriyasu reveal on July 7’s ‘news zero’ that he had considered bringing forward striker Kenjiro Shiogai (Wolfsburg) in overtime. The comment ignited a firestorm on social media, with fans comparing it to past substitution errors. The most recent result was a 3‑0 win over Bolivia on 2025‑11‑18, and the side has been on a WWWDL run in its last five matches, though the loss to Brazil remains a sore point.

What exactly was the plan?

Moriyasu said, “Actually, we had it in mind,” explaining that if the Brazil match went to extra time he would have liked to field Shiogai. He highlighted the forward’s “explosive mobility” and his ability to “damage a tired opponent.” Shiogai only appeared as a sub in the Netherlands game, but the coach noted his “glowing” attitude in training. In overtime, the extra minutes make stamina management crucial, so a fresh, fast player could be decisive.

Why do fans argue that Machino was the better choice?

In the Brazil game, forward Shuto Machino (Volshia MG) was introduced in the 33rd minute of the second half, but his impact was muted and the team conceded a late equaliser in added time. Social media users wrote, “Machino should have been swapped for Shiogai,” and “If Shiogai was the joker, Machino wasn’t needed.” They also recalled Machino’s underwhelming performance against Sweden, reinforcing the belief that Shiogai’s speed and physicality would have suited an exhausted opponent.

What lies ahead for Japan?

Moriyasu’s comments show tactical flexibility, but whether he will act on them depends on the next fixture. Japan is currently on a three‑win, one‑draw, one‑loss streak, regaining confidence. The upcoming opponent is defensively solid, making Shiogai’s pace an attractive option. If he gets the nod, the coach’s boldness could earn praise and shape Japan’s approach in future international tournaments.